金马彩票|金马彩票

来源：金马彩票2024-01-31 17:48

金马彩票

纪检监察机关围绕重点民生工作跟进监督保障祥和过节******

　　纪检监察机关围绕重点民生工作

　　跟进监督保障祥和过节

　　本报讯(记者李灵娜)春节临近，各地各部门用心用情、扎实细致做好重点民生工作。中央纪委日前印发《关于做好2023年元旦春节期间正风肃纪工作的通知》，各级纪检监察机关着眼保障人民群众度过安定祥和的节日，大力纠治在民生保障、帮扶救助、安全生产等方面不作为乱作为问题，推动解决群众“急难愁盼”。

　　“快过年了，预订年夜饭的客人多吗？最近市场监管部门有到酒楼来吗？”“已经快订满了。区市场监管部门来过几次，提醒我们要保证食材质量和卫生安全。”离春节不到半个月，四川省成都市纪委监委驻市市场监督管理局纪检监察组与驻在部门执法人员组成3个联合监督检查小组，深入全市酒店食府，围绕团年宴进货有无索证索票、食材储存管理是否合规、厨余垃圾如何处理、市场监管所执法人员检查频次和发现问题等，摸排一线监管人员有无不作为、慢作为、假作为、乱作为问题，督促推动市场监管系统动起来、紧起来、严起来，以实际行动守卫人民群众的“年夜饭”食品安全。

　　“我们监督聚焦‘民意最盼’，将团年宴食品安全检查工作具体情况，作为近期监督重点，直接到一线点位去，详细了解相关职能部门履职履责情况，以精准监督压实职能部门和属地政府责任，助力护民生、保安全。”成都市纪委监委第五纪检监察室主任刘学强说。

　　湖北省宜昌市纪委监委正在持续开展“下基层察民情解民忧暖民心”实践活动，发动全市纪检监察干部深入山区乡村、低保社区，以空巢老人、留守儿童、残疾人等困难群体为重点，逐村实地走访，逐项精准核查。1月以来，已经开展走访15次，发现并督促解决问题68个，保障群众平安祥和过节。

　　前不久，宜昌市远安县纪委监委党风政风监督室副主任覃雯雯来到茅坪场镇九龙村，偶然发现脱贫户张善新家中房梁受白蚁蛀食，房屋存在安全隐患。走访中，覃雯雯发现好几户村民家中都存在类似问题。远安县纪委监委随即将相关情况“点对点”反馈至县住建局，督促相关单位明确整改责任人和销号时间。1月5日，覃雯雯来到张善新家中进行回访。“去年发现房梁上好多小孔后，我每天都提心吊胆，怕哪天房梁被挖空了。这才没过几天，干部们就来教了防治白蚁的办法，还帮忙换了受损房梁。”张善新说。

　　“智能燃气表免费更换及集中入户安检推进怎样？供气管网设施及输配系统是否消除安全隐患？”“要加强燃气安全管理，做好应急预案，全力保障人民群众的生命财产安全”……近日，江苏省太仓市纪委监委紧盯节日期间安全生产领域问题易发多发环节，进一步整合、统筹、优化各方监督力量，联合应急、住建、环保、市场监管等职能部门开展精准监督，持续织密“监督网”，督促相关职能部门加大执法力度，全面排查整治贯彻落实年前安全风险防控不严密、安全责任落实不到位等各类民生领域的安全隐患问题，以精准有效的监督执纪执法回应群众期盼、保障民生福祉。

　　“在这次专项监督检查中，我们一手全力解决群众的急难愁盼，一手大力整治群众身边的腐败和作风问题，从‘小切口’做好民生‘大文章’。针对民生领域典型案件，通过综合运用纪检监察建议、组织专项治理及加大曝光力度等方式，打出监督‘组合拳’，督促各级党组织把‘人民至上、生命至上’的要求落实到具体工作中。”太仓市纪委监委相关负责人说。(中国纪检监察报)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.